The President’s efforts to prod Ukraine into conducting investigations to help his re-election are hurting that nation’s defense against Russian aggression. While the emphasis in the U.S. is whether the President was guilty of impeachable conduct, Ukraine has a dangerous war on its hands.
Let’s not lose sight of the fact that Russia attacked Ukraine in 2014, seized and annexed Crimea, and ever since has been engaged in a deadly proxy war to seize sizable portions of eastern Ukraine. The U.S. has viewed the Russian aggression as a serious threat to American interests and has been Ukraine’s main supplier of military assistance.
Since the fighting began, about 13,000 Ukrainians have died from hostile action. Even though there is a supposed ceasefire in effect now, pro-Russian forces committed 60 violations just on September 24. Ukraine desperately needs our help to defend itself. There is no place for domestic U.S. politics in this struggle.
Congress has authorized about $1.5 billion in military aid to Ukraine since 2014. Almost $400 million was approved for release in May 2019 by the Pentagon, based on its certification that the Ukrainian Government had “taken substantial actions” toward “decreasing corruption” and “increasing accountability.”
Because the aid package was set to expire on September 30, it was critical to disburse it before then. The aid was urgently needed on the ground for counter-artillery radars, sniper rifles, medical supplies and a wide variety of other essential war-fighting materiel.
Secure communications equipment was desperately needed because the Russians have been using cyber warfare to hack and jam Ukrainian communications–a fundamental necessity on the battlefield. L3 Technologies, an American manufacturer of secure commo systems, had a shipment ready to deliver to Ukraine in July when it received word that a hold had been placed on the order.
It was later learned that our President had personally put a hold on all military assistance to Ukraine the week before his famous July 15 telephone conversation with President Zelensky. When the hold was discovered, bipartisan pressure forced the President to release the aid on September 11, just 19 days before it would have expired. As it turns out, there was no legitimate justification for the two-month hold.
As documented in the partial notes of the phone call released by the White House, the President requested that Zelensky investigate former Vice President Biden, offering the assistance of Attorney General Barr and Rudy Giuliani.
The conversation was likely applauded by President Putin, as it provided some normalcy for his interference in the 2016 election and a green light for more of the same in 2020. If Trump was inviting Ukrainian intervention in the 2020 election, why couldn’t the Russians do an encore of their dirty work? The conversation also weakened the Ukrainian leader because he came off looking weak, pliable and corruptible.
Putin is also the beneficiary of another Ukraine development. At the same time Trump was telegraphing the weakening of U.S. military support for Ukraine, our President was pushing Zelensky to make a deal with Putin’s proxy warriors. Most recently, during their meeting at the U.N. on September 25, Trump told a glum-looking Zelensky he “really” hoped Zelensky and Putin could work things out.
Zelensky appears to have concluded that he was holding a weak hand because on October 1 he announced a deal with the proxies to hold a local election in the contested areas to determine their fate. I’m sure the Russians will not try to rig that election. Zelensky’s predecessor, former president Petro Poroshenko, called the deal “a capitulation to Russia,” saying the agreement is “playing into Russia’s hands.” Russia, on the other hand, has applauded the agreement.
I fear we have let the Ukrainian people down. They were making some progress in fighting a two-pronged war against internal corruption and Russian aggression, but appear to have suffered a setback on both fronts with our “help.”
Can you help me to understand why there are so many in Congress that still support him and refuse to admit he did anything wrong? This should NOT be a partisan issue. I fear the precedent it will set.
Some of the people in Congress agree with the President on a wide range of issues and support him all the way. Some disagree on quite a number of issues but are afraid to go public with their disagreement for fear that his hard core followers will vote them out in a primary election. Trump has turned on those who have spoken out against him and supported their primary election opponents. Even if they believe that he is doing wrong, they value their Congressional office more than their own integrity. For those people, loyalty to the President gives them longevity in office. There may come a time when the President becomes vulnerable because of misconduct in office and I would expect many of those people to abandon him in order not to be dragged down to defeat along with him. Stay tuned.
Thanks for the feedback.
Jim, thank you for this insightful article. It is right on target and well written.
Lynn
Thanks, Lynn. I appreciate hearing from you. We have serious problems here at home but we can’t lose sight of the fact that our disfunction is radiating out across the world. Jim