There has been a bit of discussion over the years as to what William Shakespeare’s character, Dick the Butcher, meant when he said: “The first thing we do is, let’s kill all the lawyers.” Butcher made the comment in Henry VI, Part II while considering how to carry out a coup against King Henry VI. Former US Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens likely hit the nail on the head when he said in a 1985 decision, “Shakespeare insightfully realized that disposing of lawyers is a step in the direction of a totalitarian form of government.” Dick’s kindred spirit, Donald Trump, has apparently recognized that a coup against America’s democracy may not succeed without neutralizing the country’s legal profession. Thankfully, killing is not in his playbook. Rather, Trump is using blackmail and intimidation to silence our lawyers.
Trump’s opening salvo was fired directly at Seattle-based Perkins Coie LLP (Perkins), a national law firm with a well-regarded office in Boise. Trump shocked the American legal community by releasing an unconstitutional “Executive Order” on March 6 (Order), attacking Perkins with a number of meritless, trumped-up claims. The first paragraph revealed his motive–Perkins had obviously enraged Trump by representing Hillary Clinton in her 2016 race against him and he was out for revenge.
As a private citizen, Trump sued Clinton, Perkins and a long list of others on some of the same claims in 2022. That case was dismissed by a federal judge as totally without merit. The judge required Trump and his attorneys to pay $937,989 in sanctions, based on the finding that: “Thirty-one individuals and entities were needlessly harmed in order to dishonestly advance a political narrative. A continuing pattern of misuse of the courts by Mr. Trump and his lawyers undermines the rule of law, portrays judges as partisans, and diverts resources from those who have suffered actual legal harm.” Nothing has changed with Trump, except that now, as President, he can misuse his power to continue with his vendetta.
In a remarkable exercise in gaslighting, the Order accused Perkins of “undermining democratic elections, the integrity of the courts, and honest law enforcement.” Among other things, Trump ordered that Perkins lawyers have any security clearances suspended, that their access to federal buildings be limited and that agencies refrain from hiring them. Two provisions are designed to scare current and prospective clients away from Perkins–requiring government contractors “to disclose any business they do with Perkins” and requiring agencies to review all contracts “with entities that disclose doing business with Perkins.” As obviously intended, those provisions have already driven business away from Perkins.
The Order is violative of several provisions of the US Constitution, including the First, Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Perkins filed suit to enjoin enforcement of the Order and have it declared unconstitutional, correctly asserting that the “retaliatory aim of the Order is intentionally obvious to the general public and the press because the very goal is to chill future lawyers from representing particular clients” and “to deter both government officials and private sector workers from participating in new inquiries into [Trump’s] conduct.”
A federal judge heard the case on March 12 and issued an order temporarily prohibiting the enforcement of the most obnoxious provisions of the Order. She found the Order to be motivated by Trump’s “retaliatory animus” and designed to carry out a “personal vendetta.” The judge observed that the entire Order was “invalid.”
Instead of taking the judge’s hint to behave like a law-abiding President, Trump doubled down two days later by issuing a similar aggrievance-filled Executive Order targeting another prominent law firm, Paul Weiss, that Trump had petty grievances against. Unfortunately, that firm could not summon the courage to challenge Trump’s order, meekly acquiescing like a whipped pup.
Having beaten the cowardly Paul Weiss firm into submission, Trump has tried to intimidate the rest of the legal profession into silence. On March 22, he issued an unhinged “Presidential Memorandum” threatening lawyers with sanctions and penalties for pressing fraudulent and meritless claims. Those types of lawsuits are Trump’s stock in trade, so not many lawyers have been frightened by that document. The great number of court cases Trump has lost since taking office speaks for itself.
Trump has targeted several other large law firms, two of which have sued him and gotten temporary relief and one of which has buckled like Paul Weiss. It is not clear how all of this will shake out, but I believe the legal profession will rally against Trump’s concerted effort to intimidate both lawyers and judges. When the dust settles, those firms that submitted to Trump’s unconstitutional intimidation may rue the day they gave in without a fight. . Most Americans, regardless of political leanings, want lawyers who will vigorously and fearlessly protect them when faced with government overreach. If any government tried to take their rights, their guns, their livelihoods, their speech rights or their freedom, they would not hire cowardly lawyers who would bend their knees to the government.
Just like Dick the Butcher, Trump will fail to neutralize the lawyers who stand against a totalitarian form of government. He will do tremendous damage to our country during the remainder of his tenure, but America’s dedication to lawful governing is too ingrained in our DNA for the country to succumb.
Thank you for this letter. It is difficult to follow all of the ways that this crazy, vindictive man does. So I appreciate your messages.
I appreciate your comment, Yvonne.
Great comments and many illustrate significant pieces of the Humpty Dumpty pieces strewn over time since the foundations of the nation were laid.
As the learned are finding out Dick recently exchanged his cutlery replacing the executive butcher knife for a meat cleaver by filing a Rico lawsuit against said attorneys et al to force discovery throw who is hiding the cheese.
Civil wars historically have been used to extract intrinsic wealth accumulated by land barons who accumulated chattel exempt from state and national lending opportunities.
England preceded US in Civil war. Both in the aftermath eventually jettisoned their national banking in exchange of International banking.
“Admiralty” International laws govern International banking.
Same laws that the world’s modern nations were explored, discovered & settled upon.
Given the fact the Butcher has successfully bankrupted his company four times there exists a
great chance of a longer game plan in play as the states take sides for the Federalist cheese distribution.
The goal for each state based on what has already been written is to legislate that it and its leaders do not get spewed out of the mouth of Jesus Christ.
So hard to watch the systematic undoing of our government. It’s Victor Orban’s playbook in Hungary. So thankful for lawyers & judges who are unafraid to follow their oaths and do the right thing! They are our only guardrails since so few in congress push back on what they must know is illegal and just plain wrong
Thanks, Kenny. Trump is a big fan of Victor Orban, who learned how to impose top-down government from Vladimir Putin. They both tightened the screws more gradually and used a measure of finesse. Trump’s drive toward autocracy will fail because he is moving too fast and in a ham-handed manner. A few GOP members of Congress are starting to voice meek criticisms, but those voices will be raised higher when the damage to their voters endangers their hold on office.
Thanks for your thoughts again Jim, I tend to agree with your opinion more often than not, however in this case I tend to believe the decay in our values of being a light for the world was diminished long before the scourge of MAGA politics, The appointment of Supreme Court justices who’s own behavior undermines any chance of being held accountable to any form of justice, While our elected representatives in either chamber lack any courage to take a stand against this lunatic. The only Representatives who have taken a stand against him have either been cast out or self removed themselves from the office in which they took oath’s to defend the Constitution, Meanwhile our courts languished in filings that by any measure of common sense would have thrown out by any Judge with the courage to make a decision. The reason why we are in this current situation will be studied for generations. The results of this current situation are to be determined, I still believe strongly that the best form of Government is democracy but it will only work if The people participate in it. And really if we want to try and figure out what went wrong it’s as simple as the Rats grabbed the cheese of democracy and Won’t give it back until they are stomped on by a big boot! Good people need to put their Boots on and get to work!!! Have a good day.
Thanks, Jeff. I would agree that things are looking bleak. However, I take some comfort in the columns of Heather Cox Richardson. I’m often surprised by some of the historic parallels she writes about. This period is not as bad as the Civil War period, but clearly among the worst. It is often said that a person must hit rock bottom before they can rise up. I realize that the rise-up phase does not always occur. A country may go through the same thing. Trump has hastened our descent to the bottom and I expect we will be there in the next few months. But I believe he has wakened many who were sleeping–people who did not keep informed and vote. When many of those people are personally affected by his crazy machinations, they may see the need to become involved and demand public servants who will work hard to serve public needs, rather than winning office by stoking fear and outrage. Although I’m an eternal optimist, I think we will be able to dig ourselves out of this ugly hole. My best, Jim